Commentary: In defense of Ingmar Bergman
Saturday, August 11th, 2007by Roger Ebert
I have long known and admired the Chicago Reader’s film critic, Jonathan Rosenbaum, but his recent attack on filmmaker Ingmar Bergman in the New York Times is a bizarre departure from his usual sanity. It says more about Rosenbaum’s love of stylistic extremes than it does about Bergman and audiences. Who else but Rosenbaum could actually base an attack on the complaint that Bergman had what his favorites Carl Theodor Dreyer and Robert Bresson lacked, “the power to entertain — which often meant a reluctance to challenge conventional filmgoing habits”? In what parallel universe is the power to entertain defined in that way?